Linq to XML needs an XNamespaceScope class

When working with XML data we inevitably have to concern ourselves with XML namespaces + XML namespace prefixes.  The Linq to XML API has been designed to make dealing with namespaces and namespaces prefixes as direct and straightforward as possible.  Rather than having to deal with XmlNamespaceManagers and the like we simple reference all of our elements and attributes using their fully expanded name (namespace + local name).

While the simplification provided by Linq to XML makes dealing with namespaces slightly more straightforward it doesn't go as far as I think it needs to.  We still need to remember to include our namespaces in every query we perform.  When working with XML trees that only contain one default namespace I'd like something simpler.  Enter the XNamespaceScope class.  The XNamespaceScope class would be used similar to how we make use of the TransactionScope class for managing transactions.  When we're about to work with an XML tree that only contains one namespace which we're interested in we can new up a XNamespaceScope class, place it inside a using block that surrounds our query expressions, and have Linq to XML use the XNamespace that's passed to the XNamespaceScope in all queries within the block.  So rather than this code where we have to repeatedly include our namespace (ns)

    1 XNamespace ns = "http://webservices.amazon.com/AWSECommerceService/2005-10-05";

    2 var booksToImport =

    3   from amazonItem in amazonXml.Descendants(ns + "Item")

    4   let attributes = amazonItem.Element(ns + "ItemAttributes")

    5   select new Book {

    6     Isbn=(string) attributes.Element(ns + "ISBN"),

    7     Title=(string) attributes.Element(ns + "Title"),

    8     PubDate=(DateTime) attributes.Element(ns + "PublicationDate"),

    9     Price=ParsePrice(attributes.Element(ns + "ListPrice")),

   10     BookAuthors=GetAuthors(attributes.Elements(ns + "Author"))

   11   };

We instead do:

    1 XNamespace ns = "http://webservices.amazon.com/AWSECommerceService/2005-10-05";

    2 using(new XNamespaceScope(ns)) {

    3   var booksToImport =

    4     from amazonItem in amazonXml.Descendants("Item")

    5     let attributes = amazonItem.Element("ItemAttributes")

    6     select new Book {

    7       Isbn=(string) attributes.Element("ISBN"),

    8       Title=(string) attributes.Element("Title"),

    9       PubDate=(DateTime) attributes.Element("PublicationDate"),

   10       Price=ParsePrice(attributes.Element("ListPrice")),

   11       BookAuthors=GetAuthors(attributes.Elements("Author"))

   12     };

   13 }   

 

Thoughts? 

tags: , ,

# re: Linq to XML needs an XNamespaceScope class

Thursday, September 07, 2006 2:16 AM by Steven Livingstone    
Hey Steve.

I'm not so sure - perhaps it will work in some cases, but what happens when you mix namespaces (one of the primary motives behind them!).

I posted on the MSN forums some days back the idea of associating a prefix with the namespace *if you wish* and so you could have :

1 XNamespace ns = "http://webservices.amazon.com/AWSECommerceService/2005-10-05";

1a ns.Prefix = "p";

2 var booksToImport =

3 from amazonItem in amazonXml.Descendants("p:Item")

4 let attributes = amazonItem.Element("p:ItemAttributes")

5 selectnewBook {

6 Isbn=(string) attributes.Element("p:ISBN"),

7 Title=(string) attributes.Element("p:Title"),

8 PubDate=(DateTime) attributes.Element("p:PublicationDate"),

9 Price=ParsePrice(attributes.Element("p:ListPrice")),

10 BookAuthors=GetAuthors(attributes.Elements("p:Author"))

11 };


Your idea may be nice for trivial cases, but as it gets more complex, i'm back to adding my namespaces in!

# re: Linq to XML needs an XNamespaceScope class

Thursday, September 07, 2006 8:34 AM by Steve    
More complex cases could definitely reduce the value of my vaunted XNamesapceScope class :) I envisioned that if you had multiple namespaces you would either not include the namespace scope, or you would put the default namespace in the namesapce scope and explicitly declare the namespace for elements that didn't use when querying them.

# re: Linq to XML needs an XNamespaceScope class

Saturday, September 16, 2006 9:44 PM by M. David Peterson    
Three things --

* GREAT IDEA!
* Why not just wrap namespace scopes?
* Even further, using a combination of embedded namespace scopes, Steven's one-off prefix references, and LINQ transformations...

Not *THAT* would be SWEET!!! Too late for the final release by a long shot, but definitely something to push for in v.Next, whenever that happens to be :)

# re: Linq to XML needs an XNamespaceScope class

Saturday, September 16, 2006 10:14 PM by Steve    
Three things :)

* Thanks!
* Great Idea! ;-)
* It couldn't be too late already could it? They haven't even released an initial beta of the Orcas wave of tools which Linq to XML will be a part of. Agreed that if it doesn't get in the intitial release that we'll have to push for it in v.Next!

# re: Linq to XML needs an XNamespaceScope class

Monday, September 18, 2006 12:37 PM by Mike Champion    
One problem that I see is that there is an architectural levels mismatch -- The "using namespace" construct would have to go deep into the core, but C# and the LINQ core don't want to know about XML namespaces, they only know about IEnumerable and other such abstractions.

I could imagine a a subclass of XElement whose methods only returned elements/attributes in some specified namespace .. but that might take us down the road to &eternaltorment; that DOM took with different namespace / non-namespace versions of everything. Maybe there could be some extension methods on XElement that looked at a namespace property (presumably an annotation) on the element and only returned values that matched it. The latter is something that could be layered onto LINQ to XML without deep knowledge of its internals, so that might be something you could at least prototype.

As for timing, nothing is cast in cement AFAIK. Even in the most aggressive schedule for LINQ to XML to RTM, there are months and months allotted to "stabilization", which presumably would allow for spec changes driven by real-world usability feedback. In general however, the objective of LINQ to XML v1.0 is to provide a minimal core for mainstream XML use cases and an extension mechanism (mainly extension methods, annotations, and events) that gurus could use to provide convenience methods to make corner cases easier. We'd be a LOT more likely to take suggestions for features that would improve guru extensibility than to "bloat" the API with stuff that gurus would need but might confuse novices. (Speaking only for myself, not the LINQ to XML team, blah blah).

Thanks much for the suggestion / discussion, and to Mark for pinging me about it!


# re: Linq to XML needs an XNamespaceScope class

Monday, September 18, 2006 12:51 PM by M. David Peterson    
@ Steve,

>> It couldn't be too late already could it? They haven't even released an initial beta of the Orcas wave of tools which Linq to XML will be a part of. Agreed that if it doesn't get in the intitial release that we'll have to push for it in v.Next! <<

I'm trying to think why it is that I thought the bits were already frozen???

@Mike,

>> As for timing, nothing is cast in cement AFAIK. <<

And you definitely be one of the folks who would "know"

@Both,

It seems it might be time to start learning how to extend LINQ! :D

# re: Linq to XML needs an XNamespaceScope class

Monday, September 18, 2006 1:19 PM by Steve    
Thanks for the additional details Mike!

While I'm saddened that my brilliant idea is being shunned and won't make it into the final Linq to XML bits, I also understand the design focus of XLinq and thus see why you've sent me and my brillaince packing ;-).

I'll have to start digging around with annotations and other such extensibility points to see if I can come up with a solution. Of course I could also just remember to include the namespace in all of my query extension method calls! Nah, that wouldn't be nearly as fun. :-)

Post a Comment

 
 
Prove you're not a spammer: 
4 + 4 =